User:Shaquilleoatmeal55/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Maryland Terrapins football under Jim Tatum

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maryland_Terrapins_football_under_Jim_Tatum

Lead section

The lead section is okay. It starts off with the history of the new hire of Jim Tatum and his accomplishments, who he is, where he is from and why he was hired in replace of.

Content

Content is solid i would give 8/10 talks about his national championships what maryland football was like before jim tatum as well as his home states when he won the conference and just about everything they have completed

Tone and balance

would be a 9/10 it is unbiased. It talks about when they won and also when they would lose doesnt say Maryland was ever the greatest football team.

Organization

correctly organized starts off with who he is and where his life started as an early child and smoothly flows into his college career as well ends with his end story. 10/10

I would give it an

Sources and references

I would give the references a 7/10 they have a lot of references in the bottom but the closets dates and most relative was last made in 2017 which is 7 years ago which can be a little outdated compared to anything that has happened

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)