User:Shareblaw/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Godzilla Scott Ciencin Series


 * Article Evaluation
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godzilla_(Scott_Ciencin_series) Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Somewhat, it is children’s literature, but it does not look like it was ever banned or anything like that. Is it written neutrally? Yes, there are no signs of bias that I could find.  Does each claim have a citation? No. In fact, there are no citations at all.  Are the citations reliable? N/A.  Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)? No.  Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.


 * Sources
 * https://www.betterworldbooks.com/product/detail/godzilla-invades-america-0679887520
 * https://www.kaijubattle.net/creature-feature/creature-feature-kamacuras
 * https://godzilla.com/monsterpedia/kumonga/
 * (Any of the books would help)

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Big Nate Goes for Broke


 * Article Evaluation
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Nate_Goes_for_Broke Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes, everything belongs according to the Wikipedia guidelines. Is it written neutrally? Yes, everything stated is either neutral or cited.  Does each claim have a citation? No, but there are a fair amount of citations.  Are the citations reliable? Yes, I’m not sure if the LA Times is reliable, but they all look legitimate.  Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)? No.  Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.


 * Sources
 * https://bignate.fandom.com/wiki/Big_Nate_Goes_for_Broke
 * https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/12092375-big-nate-goes-for-broke
 * https://www.commonsensemedia.org/book-reviews/big-nate-goes-for-broke-big-nate-book-4
 * https://www.overdrive.com/media/1976885/big-nate-goes-for-broke

Option 3

 * Article title
 * The Mighty Miss Malone


 * Article Evaluation
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mighty_Miss_Malone Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes, it does a great job of staying on track. Is it written neutrally? Mostly, yes. I think there are some places where this could be slightly improved, but that is mostly just nitpicking.  Does each claim have a citation? Yes.  Are the citations reliable? Yes, but it is questionable that more than half of the citations are from news articles (which can cause problems.) In addition, every source is from the exact same day. But, I’m not sure if that is a problem.  Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)? Yes.  Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.


 * Sources
 * https://www.greatfallstribune.com/story/life/2014/06/26/prejudice-poverty-driving-forces-miss-malone/11433663/
 * https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/kidspost/review-of-the-mighty-miss-malone/2012/02/02/gIQA7FuC4Q_story.html
 * https://www.nymetroparents.com/article/womens-history-month-books
 * https://bookriot.com/books-about-young-heroes/ https://www.scarsdalenews.com/community/local_life/neighbors/brothers-promote-tolerance-through-books/article_e71f34e8-7326-11eb-ab4f-674a1c189f9f.html

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources