User:SharmaPrachi12/COVID-19 lockdown in India/EyobKeflinkiel Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

SharmaPrachi12


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SharmaPrachi12/COVID-19_lockdown_in_India?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

when i read through this article their was no lead section it jumped straight into the content. This might be a way to improve the article by including a lead that would allow the reader sometime to process what the article is about.

Content:

yes the content is relevant to the to the topic. It talks about how India handled the covid-19 pandemic. Yes the Content is up-to-date with the most recent information being as close as march of this year. No the article does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps.

Tone and Balance:

- Yes this added content is neutral

- No there is no claims that appear to heavily biased toward a particular position

- No there is no view point that is overrepresented or underrepresented

- No the content does not try to persuade the reader

Sources and References -yes the added content does seem to be backed by sources

- yes the sources are current

- the sources seem to be from different Indian publications and government sources. One way to make them even more diverse would be to get some sources outside of the country, to get a different view point.

-yes the links do work

organization

-the added content seems to be organized, each section is separated into time blocks. each time block talks about what the Indian government did in that time

-the added content is easy to read

images and media

- No added images/media

could be a way to improve added content

Overall impressions:

my overall impressions was that the added content was good