User:SharmaPrachi12/COVID-19 lockdown in India/Kachina123 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

SharmaPrachi12


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Editing User:SharmaPrachi12/COVID-19 lockdown in India - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * COVID-19 lockdown in India - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The draft addition was appropriate and relevant to the article. The content added addressed the content gap in the section 'unlock' 7.0-11.0 and 'impact'. Most sources are verifiable and reliable; although information from news outlets may hold biased or unverifiable information. For example, information on the environmental impact from news outlets may not be reliable. The draft is well-structured, organized and informative. Indicating what "state/UTs" means, may assist readers with further understanding the article. Overall, the draft addresses content gaps in article, is well written and supported by mostly reliable sources.