User:SharonYubinKang/TikTok/Phchan1 Peer Review

Peer review
General info


 * Whose work are you reviewing?

SharonYubinKang


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SharonYubinKang/TikTok

Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?

Yes.


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?

It concludes a clear introductory sentence that concisely describes the article topic.


 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?

It didn’t include a brief description of the article’s major sections.


 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?

No.


 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

It is concise.

Content

Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?

The content added is relevant to the topic because it add more things about the recent update function of TikTok


 * Is the content added up-to-date?

The content is added up-to-date with the newest functions and sources.


 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

It adds more information abouTikTok, such as its role of communication worldwide.

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?

The content added is neutral without any biased opinions


 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

It didn’t show any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position.


 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

Some viewpoints are overrepresented when the user adds some top TikTok artists because there is no standard for them that all of other people believe.


 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

No. The most added content are about facts.

Sources and References

Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?

All new content are supported by those reliable source of information


 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?

All of sources reflect the topic and available literature.


 * Are the sources current?

Yes.


 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Yes, they are effective and available.

Organization

Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?

It is well-written because it is concise, clear, and easy to read.


 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?

After checking, there is no any grammatical or spelling error.


 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Yes. The added content is divided into three major points of the topic.

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?

It didn’t add image or media, but I think it will be effective to show some image of the TikTok user interface to enhance readers’ understanding of the topic.


 * Are images well-captioned?

No image


 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?

No image


 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

No image.

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?

The content added effectivelimprovesve the overall quality of the article.


 * What are the strengths of the content added?

The strengths of the content added include clear organization, expanding information, and more detailed content based on the original article.


 * How can the content added be improved?

I think it would be more perfect if the content can add a feimagesge about the user interface to help readers understand the function of TikTok. In addition, if the added content can be related to more information about commercial profit and trade of TikTok, the article will be more complete. In addition, some controversial opinions about TikTik also can be mentioned to expand the information.

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?