User:Shawn.preston/Evaluate an Article

The topic of Environmental geology is a complex discipline and should have multiple sub disciplines incorporated within the actual body of definition. There is nothing to distract me, however, I think there should be some kind of photo-graphical evidence of the discipline being done in situ. The information is just a broad explanation of what the disciplines looks at and does not dive into the mechanisms behind what causes them as well as there is no real concurrent evidence of citations minus the one given. Things that could improve on this article are the founders of environmental geology, the time line at which it was founded, government funded research that goes into this discipline as well as a break down of what we can learn and interpret from this discipline.

The article is very generic and monotone and has no bias opinions one way or another. The viewpoints are too limited to be represented as over represented or under represented.

There is one source that leads to a book on Environmental Earth Science that does not explain anything in context other than the author, data, and ISBN number. To determine if the limited amount of information that is found on this article is correct you would have to order, rent, or find this book online and go through it manually to determine if the source is appropriate which is time consuming and although it is a book, it is not peer reviewed literature.

There is no talking points from other individuals in the Talk section, therefore, I can not determine if there is a conversation about this topic. It is not apart of any Wiki Projects other than myself now.