User:ShaynaSaltzburg/Wunderbar Syracuse/RongpengZ Peer Review

General info
ShaynaSaltzburg, SPark0141
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:ShaynaSaltzburg/Wunderbar Syracuse - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * User:ShaynaSaltzburg/Wunderbar Syracuse - Wikipedia:

Evaluate the drafted changes
I think all content of the page is relevant to the topic of the article. All content is about the Wunderbar. I think the layout of this page may need a improvement. I think the guidebox needs to be removed. The content and source are also mixed together which look like a little bit messy. The content may also needs to be more organized. It can be organized by headings, subheadings and paragraphs to make it easier for the audience to read.

I think there is not a notable equity gap. The information is also up to date. The newest information comes from 2023. I think the lead may don't give people a good summary about the page. I think this article is neutral. The content is mostly based on the fact, and the tone of the article is also neutral. The fact is referenced with an appropriate reference, and the links of citation also works well. The sources mostly comes from news and social media. I think it may still need more reliable source for the credibility of the content. It also need more resources to make sure the sources come from a diverse array of authors and publications.

Overall, I think the article may still need a lot of work, but it provides people the general information about Wunderbar. People can know what Wunderbar is from this page.