User:Shayna F/Kuru (disease)/Maxwellmcgowan Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The lead includes all major notes and is a very good description for Kuru. I like how you include how it can be picked apart from similar diseases. You may need to relate the subject to the original article's major sections such as the history etc. The detail is high due to the complex nature of the disease, it may help to further connect the the remaining part of the article.

Content

The topics are easily relevant and up to date, and the process

Tone & Balance

The tone seems to be perfectly neutral. This doesn't seem to be considered original research as all points are cited and left clear where it was grabbed from.

Sources & Reference

All sources are from the last 10 years (except for the last) so they are all up to date. They are from government and official sources and seem to be very good.

Organization

Grammar and spelling is good, just make sure that Kuru and all other proper nouns are capitalized (Kuru is uncapitalized in sentence one of paragraph 3)

Images & Media

N/A