User:She Her Demographer85/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mar%C3%ADa_Luisa_Aguilar
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate: I chose this page because Maria Luisa was amongst the women in physics and astronomy who may be notable enough for a Wikipedia biography. I have looked for women (a) have an article in a latin-american language (es, pt, pt-br) so I can translate it to en to establish notability,. Also, she is from Peru, and I want to increase representation of Latin American women on Wikipedia.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Concise, maybe could shed light on more of her accomplishments.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content up-to-date? No
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No

Content evaluation
The biography is quite good, although deserved more research and a detailed portrait of Maria Luisa's career and acomplishments

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? No
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? No
 * Are the sources current? No
 * Check a few links. Do they work? The majority yes.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? No

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No
 * Are images well-captioned? No
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? No

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Not so much. They claim to struggle to improve her article.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? No.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? No

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Average
 * What are the article's strengths? Consise description of her story and accomplishment
 * How can the article be improved? Yes, find some of her classes taught, more on her research, more content.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Underdeveloped.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discusi%C3%B3n:Mar%C3%ADa_Luisa_Aguilar