User:Sheepies/Will and Testament (Novel)/Rnh3u Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

AidanAjw, Sheepies, Ssr13


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * User:Sheepies/Will and Testament (Novel)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * N/A

Lead
The lead introduces the novel, author, and publishers in a concise and well-formatted manner. It includes an accurate content section with working links.

Content
The content added is relevant to the novel and includes up-to-date references with working links. The article does mention a historically underrepresented population. (women, victims of sexual assault), however, the tone remained neutral and the movement was appropriately linked to a different page.

Tone and Balance
The content that was added was kept neutral. Claims of whether or not the family was okay with the publishing of the novel was mentioned in “Reception and Controversy,” but both sides were mentioned equally briefly and no side was taken by the article, which is as it should be.

Sources and References
There are 16 sources in the review. All the sources are linked appropriately and are recent (up-to date and relevant). The links are all working as of 4/5/2021. The sites also seem to be reliable and varied (there are news sites, “.edu” sites, book reviews, etc.).

Organization
The article is well-written and concise. I corrected a spelling error, and an inquiry on the possibility of one is included below. The “contents” box presents a clear overview of everything, and the links work as of 4/5/2021.

Images and Media
As of 4/5/2021 there are no images or media.

Overall Impressions (and notability)
This article meets the Notability requirement. It also has appropriate headings, subheadings, and flow. The article does contain links to other articles such as the Me Too Movement.

The article appears relatively complete other than a few suggestions listed below:


 * Plot summary section: I understand that the story is being told in flashbacks. However, it is very confusing to read because time is very fluid/ events are occurring out of order in this section. Maybe add a little clarification on time the events being discussed are taking place. An example can be something like “Then, the audience learns that...when....” or “Then, it is learned that.” The content of this section is nicely done, it is just the organization/flow of it that is confusing to readers.
 * Major Characters section: I am not sure who Berglot is; they are mentioned in the point about Åsa and Ebba, Søren, and Tale. I’m not sure if it is a misspelling of Bergljot, an alternative spelling, or a separate character. Please, add clarification on this or fix spelling error if there is one.
 * Themes Section: It is expressed that “...character interactions between siblings and between mother and daughter exhibit many Freudian traits.” Maybe this can be expanded on further with an example.