User:Sheharyarakhtar786/Evaluate an Article

computer technology and developing areas.
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (lik): Computer technology for developing areas.
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate: I have chosen this Topic because in today's worlds we need computer technology and developing areas is often through the donation of technology to developing areas. Many institutions, government, charitable, and for-profit organizations require technology development often involving hardware or software design.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes the introductory is very clear about the article.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Yes the lead has a brief description of the article.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Yes it has include the information
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * It is overly detailed.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes in few points it is relevant to the Topic.
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Yes the content has a up-to-date.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * It is perfect if we read that content.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Yes it is neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Yes the claims is heavily appear.
 * Are there viewpoints that are over represented, or underrepresented?
 * Yes the viewpoints is over represented.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * Yes the article is persuade to the reader because it is very clear.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes the facts are a reliable to secondary source of information.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes the literature on the topic is available.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes the few source is current.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * No every things is good.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes it is well written and very clear.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No errors in this article.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes it is well organized.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Yes the images is enhance and was very easy to understand to the topic.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Yes it is well-captioned.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Few images belong to Wikipedia.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * No.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * Some conversations is about the technology are going behind the scene.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any Wiki Projects?
 * The rated of the article is good there some like and some comments on this aticle.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * The Wikipedia discuss this topic in very clear sentences, which we talk in the class as same in detailed.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * Is trying to introduce the more technology in future.
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * The strengths of this article is good.
 * How can the article be improved?
 * I think it is good.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
 * In my opinion the article is beautiful, which is clear and well-developed.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: