User:Sheharyarakhtar786/Hybrid cars/Sheharyarakhtar786 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * I m reviewing sheharyar akhtar 786
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Hybrid vehicle

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes the lead is updated to the new content.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes the lead has an introductory and the article.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Yes the articles has a major sections.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Every thing was good.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * The lead is good.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes it added the neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Yes there are some claims that appear to some position.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Yes, the viewpoints are very clear.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * I think yes.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes it has a reliable secondary source of information is mentioned.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes it is on the topic.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes the source are current.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes it has done some works.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes every things is written very well and perfect.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No every things was good.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * No the content was good and it has reflect a good major points of the topic.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Yes the article include the images which we are understanding of the topics.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * I think some images are well- captioned.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * I think few images. are adhere to Wikipedia copyright.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * I think some images are laid out in a visually way.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * Yes the article meet the Wikipedia requirements.
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Yes it is represent all accurately literature on the subject.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Yes the article follow the beautiful pattern which includes the heading and the others features of the similar articles.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?
 * I think yes.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Every thing was beautiful and perfect nothing was going to added in this article.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * The strengths of this content was the main points of this article.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * I think nothing can be improve because every things was perfect and very clear.