User:Shelby.slk600/Staphylococcus pseudintermedius/Daniela.dbs534 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (Sag064)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Staphylococcus pseudintermedius

Lead evaluation
Lead section was updated to include content added by Savannah regarding diagnosis. It was concise and summarized all the key points that she would further detail in her section. The lead included a brief description of all the major sections except "Epidemiology" and "Zoonoses" at the time of reviewing the article. The lead did not include any information that was not in the article and overall it was concise and summarized the sections well.

Content evaluation
The content was relevant to the topic and summarized diagnostic tools available well and highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of each. The content seems up to date and includes recent advances in diagnostic testing.

Tone and balance evaluation
The tone of the content was neutral and did not try to sway the reader's view one way or another. She was able to present all the different methods without bias and if one diagnostic tool was preferred over another she gave reasons as to why.

Sources and references evaluation
Sources were relatively recent (within the last ten years) and the links provided worked.

Organization evaluation
The content was well written and is concise. It was organized into appropriate sub-headings and overall was very well done!

Overall evaluation
Overall Savannah and her group did a great job. Savannah's section was very well written.