User:ShelbyGodby/Acinetobacter baylyi/CutterJackson Peer Review

The lead is very good at establishing the overlying information about the article/bacterium.

The metabolism section is very detailed and well written. It is very in-depth, but not so in-depth that it is difficult to understand as an outside reader, and it also ties in research that has been done using the bacteria, which is very good. Great job in this section!

The Genetic Mechanisms section is great as well; however, I would recommend adding crosslinks to this section as there are some things that I would like to be able to clarify, have explained, and just research more in depth.

I like the virulence section; however I would like it to be more in depth, and perhaps explain things that cause the bacteria does differently when it is a pathogen, since it is a opportunistic pathogen. Still, good information! Same with the survival section, maybe just add a little more information.

In the treatment section, maybe talk about the specific functions that these antibiotics target in order to inhibit the growth and survival of the pathogen.

I would go more in depth in the applications section also.

Overall, This is a very good start to the article as the original had very little information. You went very in depth in specific sections and did a great job finding important and interesting information. Great job!

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)