User:ShellieHu/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Visual communication

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I am interested in visual communication. Since it contains a relatively broad scope of topics and has been evolving over time, I would like to explore how this concept can be best represented. My preliminary impression of visual communication is the way people use visual elements to convey ideas and information, and it should be multidisciplinary.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Everything in the article is relevant to the topic. There are many interesting points that I have never thought of. However, in the History section, I wonder if more information about how visual communication has evolved from print to screen could be included, and maybe with some interpretation of Eye of Horus (as it is significant in visual culture) among other historically significant topics. Also, visual communication should not be limited to 2D, so there could be more evaluation on multidimensional visual communication.

The article is largely neutral, but there could be more diversity in important figures in the Overview section, as the two representative figures are European males. The Culture section doesn't expand much but only stick with on high and low-context cultures. Such binary classification might underrepresent many nuances. The negative influences of visual communication in science and medicine might need more clarity, since different scientific fields might need different approach to solving the problem, far more complicated than what are listed in this section.The citation sources are relatively up to date -- majority of them are from 2010s, but I still expect for a greater range of authorship not only limited to English-speaking countries.