User:Shelly Nazareth/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Griselda Pollock

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because my preliminary impression of it was that it was not fairly awarding Griselda Pollock due credit for her merits by being classified as containing intricate amounts of information that only interest a particular audience.

Evaluate the article
The lead section of the article is concise and introduces the articles main sections, however, it does not give a general overview of what will be discussed in the following sections. The tone throughout the whole article is unbiased and seems fairly balanced previous to educating myself on the topic. The article's contents are relevant to the topic. There is some content that does not belong to the topic, such as the excessive sharing of publications accomplished by Griselda Pollock. The article is correctly sourced and the links work.

The talk page of this article addressed issues I was already weary of such as the excessive amount of publications that caused the article to fall under the classification of interest of a particular audience.

The overall status of the article is okay. The structure needs improvement as some added sections where unnecessary and some sections contain less information than others creating an unbalance in the distribution of relevant information.