User:Shenali.P/African Giant/Nilsuc Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * I am reviewing Shenali.P's work.
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Shenali.P/sandbox

Lead evaluation
The lead has been updated to reflect the new content added. The lead does include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic. The lead does not include a brief description of the article's major sections. It does not include information that is not present in the article.The lead is concise.

Content evaluation
The content added is relevant to the topic however it could include more recent facts and events. All content belongs to the topic, the writer needs to fill in the sections titled "First Wave Ifeoluwa" and "Second WaveOke Tude". More content needs to be added to the section titled Syncretic Religion in Africa.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
The content added is neutral and does not seem biased. The article overrepresents the opinions focusing on peace between people of different religions. There are no scholarly opinions included on the other end of the spectrum.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:

Sources and references evaluation
None of the content has been backed by a source. There are no references, neither is there a references section included in the article. The writer will need to also refer to more literature available on the topic.

Organization
Guiding questions:

Organization evaluation
The content is concise, clear and easy to read. There are a few errors-for example I don't think the "..." are necessary in a Wikipedia article after sentences. Moreover some letters need to be capitalized, for example "african". There are incomplete sentences and spelling errors within them such as in "Sectarian violence Small churches in Lagos will see both Quran and Bible on the lecturn". In terms of organization, I think the history section will need to better explain and reference the upcoming sections of the article. As of now, the reader is unaware of how these upcoming sections are relevant to the topic.

Images and media evaluation
There are no images or media in this article.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

New Article Evaluation
I am unsure whether the writer will make this into a new article or is adding onto what they are currently assigned to. The writer is currently assigned to an article called African Giant, however the sandbox has Chrislam in Nigeria as the topic. The article does not include secondary sources as of now, as the references are missing. Therefore it does not meet the Notability requirement. The article does not represent all available literature on the topic. Infoboxes are missing. The article does not link to other articles.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:

Overall evaluation
I think there is a good chunk of historical information, however there is still a lot of work that needs to be completed. Sections that are present are missing information or they are blank. There needs to be a section with more scholarly debate and discussion reflecting different views. The content that is present does bring together certain discussions, however this can be made stronger with different perspectives included as mentioned before.