User:Shenassak/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.) Contemporary dance

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article to evaluate because it is of interest to me, and one that I have knowledge on. It seems to have a good general outline of contemporary dance, and its history.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead section:

- Has a good introductory sentence. Lead mentions the various areas that will be talked about in the page, and is concise.

- Lead does not mention area about dance and technology

Content:

- Content is generally relevant to the topic. Information on dance and technology doesn't seem like an area that should be a major topic of this article. Content is up to date. Content could be added about music involved in contemporary dance. Article does not deal with one of wikipedias equity gaps. Could add section about the importance of POC in contemporary dance.

Tone and balance:

- tone is neutral, no strong biases or viewpoints that are over or under represented.

Sources and references:

- Sources are not always listed. The sources on the article are reliable and come from different types of literature. Most of the sources are not from a diverse group of authors, more improvement could be done within this area.

Organization and writing quality:

- error in spelling in the lead. Otherwise, organization and spelling is good.

Images and media:

- images and media are well organized and captioned.

Overall impression:

- page is well organized. Area of dance and technology may not be relevant enough to incorporate into the article. More information could be added on the music of contemporary dance.