User:Sherese Onwu/Animal Domestication and Management in the Philippines/JoselynYanez Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * Sherese Onwu, Britlari, VBuchcik
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * User:Sherese Onwu under sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes but it should be added before the table of contents
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No random extra info.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * It is concise.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes it is neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Yes topics concerning tribes that were responsble so domesticating animals, theories for animal domestication should have been included.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes I checked all of them and they do work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * It should be organized in a more transitional format. Categorizing the animals under sections by similar time period or similar area of domestication would greatly benefit this article.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * None that I was able to notice.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * This content was not well organized.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Yes, but the image of the dog might be misleading as to the type of dog that was domesticated in the Philippines.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * The images can use some work on the caption, maybe include the both the scientific and the common name.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * The second rooster was placed by the cat section But the rest of the pictures were fine.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * Yes
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Only 10 sources
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Not in organizational structure and not in content table location.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?
 * Yes

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Add tribes, locations, and social customs related to the groups of animals.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * The content is there it just needs to be connected and reorganized.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * Connect the content and reorganize it.