User:Sherly-ann-Ville-gas/History of corsets/Nilmariliz Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) I am reviewing Sherlyann Villegas's article. (Sherly-ann-Ville-gas)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Sherly-ann-Ville-gas/History of corsets

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?                                                                                                                         -- Yes, I consider the introductory sentence in the lead is very informative and concise.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?                                                                                                                                                                          -- It contains a brief description of some sections of the article but not all of them. Even so, its information is very general and cover a big part of all the themes to be discussed during the article.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?                                                                                                                                                                                   -- No, all the information in the lead is later mentioned in the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?                                                                                                                                                                                                                              --The lead is very general, not very detailed. It is clear and provides the introduction you need to understand the rest of the article.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   --Yes, all the content of the article is based on the main topic, corsets.


 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?                                                                                                                                                                                                       --I consider this topic covers a lot of history, meaning it has a lot of information but all the content of the article is very complete, belongs to it and is necessary.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   --  Yes, all the content provided by the article is neutral and informative.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?                                                                                                                                                                 -- Personally I didn't notice any inclination to a particular position or opinion in the article.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?                                                                                                                                                                             -- The information is very balanced, maybe it could include a little bit of the corset today. I mean, information of what has happened with the corset and if today it is still in use.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?                                                                                                                        -- No, I consider its objective is not to persuade the reader in favor of something.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?                                                                                                                                                                   -- Yes, it is very precise and well explained making it easy to understand fluently the main topic.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?                                                                                                                                                                                     -- I didn't notice any grammatical or spelling errors.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?                                                                                                                               --Yes, I consider it very opportune how it is organized by centuries.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?                                                                                                                                                                              -- Yes, the images contribute a very clear and beneficial representation of what the article is talking about.
 * Are images well-captioned?                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 --Yes, all the images are well explained.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?                                                                                                                                                                                                         -- Yes, all the images are well organized and each one is besides its explanation part in the article.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?