User:Sherrysyc/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Westlake exposition

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I choose the article because the events happened in a place I am very familiar. Also the topic of the article is an important historical events for the city. The article explain the what the event is and some other basic components of it. But the article missing the social, political, economical and historical components that contributed to the successful 1929 Westlake exposition.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)


 * Since the article is short and brief, the leading section and body content are blended together.
 * The content is relevant to the topic
 * There are some content missing which is the component I want to edit.
 * Tone and Balance
 * The tone is neutral. No bias, and over- or under-representation.
 * Source and Reference
 * All the source and reference links for the article are working.
 * Talk Page Discussion
 * The talk page shows two times editing related to renew and modify external links.
 * Overall Impression
 * Overall the article provides neutral and accurate information about the Westlake Exposition, but not comprehensive.
 * The article could add some historical conditions for the area. Also the impacts of the exposition.
 * I would access the article as underdeveloped.