User:Shewhospeaks

I once heard a physicist state, "the monopole should be as abundant as gold". Immediately the thought came to me, "of course..... every atom except hydrogen is a monopole". Where the thought came from I do not know, but I've been searching for this elusive creature ever since. Based on a hypothetical posture of a new elucidation of the atom by my late husband I began the search for how this creature might look, how it differed from our current structural determination. What I found is an image that taunts my dreams and every waking moment. It simplifies the complexity of electron pairing and their residence in shells and sub-shells, and the chaotic elliptical orbitals in which they reside. It defines the electrons peripheral linear relationship to its nuclear proton and the equilateral triangular relationship of the proton to neutron. The proton at the apex (positive) and the neutron at its base line (positive and negative). The neutron, specifically the psi meson; its quark and anti-quark function as a reverse bias of energy to matter/matter to energy. If energy equals the mass Heisenberg's Uncertainty is no longer in question for position and momentum are one and the same, so (q) is to (p) what (p) is to (q). Without measure in between there is indication the time factor is non-existent. The paradox of the dual nature of light also finds resolve in that it is neither a particle nor a wave. Where the electron fires is in direct response to the nuclear demand and is precisely the sum of things. This new structure of the atom recalibrates energy to matter ratios, thereby indicating isotopes are an anomaly which I term "contained rest mass" which to date has not been quantified. The image offers no geometric abberations. It indicates the vertical velocity equals the angular momentum and the incident angle of light equals its reflection without consideration of refractive indices. Therefore, refraction was all along in opposition to gravitational fields. So, with only three forces to deal with; electromagnetism (oxymoron), the weak and strong forces, the answer became pristinely clear. There are two forces; the electro-weak and magnetic-strong. When the event of the two occur in a simultaneity we see unification of the forces within context of that elusive monopole.

L2=EM if: [(cv)(hv)(1/2mv2)]=L2, then E=mL2

When squaring the light one must take into consideration squaring the velocity or "speed" without factoring in angular momentum (four inversive moves; two convex, two concave), then the lights incident angle does not equal its reflection.

Note: In Einstein's manuscript on the theory of relativity auctioned at Sotheby's in the late 90's he originally wrote L for light, then crossed it out and wrote E for energy. What was he thinking? The last 30 years of his life he worked to reconcile gravity and unify the forces. Read "Letters to Solovine". In letter dated Feb.12,1951 pg.123 Einstein states, "the unified field theory has been brought to a conclusion. But it is hard to use it mathematically for, inspite of all the trouble I have gone to, I am not able to verify it in any way." My question, though he proposed a unified field in 1950 to the scientific community this letter one year later says it is complete, so where is it? Who took his manuscripts? I think he tells us on page 127 in letter written March 29, 1951. Apparently, Truman and his followers were delivering the manuscripts to Solovine. Obviously, the government watched him closely. At his death in 1955 at Princeton I am certain his works were confiscated by our government. We the people have not been made privy to this information.

So it is that what the eye fails to see lays claim does not exist. Then is it not the mind to see what is and is not there?

shewhospeaks