User:Shg7D1/Empirical distribution function/Philipphaku Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Shg7D1


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shg7D1/Empirical_distribution_function?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Empirical distribution function

Evaluate the drafted changes
Shg7D1 added one citation at the very beginning of the article.

The lead part has a few sentences that concisely describe the topic of the article. The content is up to date, neutral, and relevant to the topic.

The article so far has many images which will help readers understand the topic efficiently. Most of them were created by an editor in 2018 using JavaScript, so there are no copyright issues. Also, the article does not have any grammatical or spelling errors so far. The sources are current, but three of the seven sources came form one author. In the section on "asymptotic properties", the content relies too much on the source aforementioned.

I would suggest putting all the parameters such as "mean, variance, mean square error etc." into a single section and writing a lead at the beginning of it. It seems like most of the sections in the table of content share a lot of similarities, so it would be better to put some of them together to make them more organized and easy to read.