User:Shivmirani/Delftia acidovorans/Anissagpowell Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info
I am reviewing the Biomineralization section of the Delftia acidovorans sandbox draft.

User:Shivmirani/Delftia acidovorans

Lead evaluation
The lead is clear and concise, and includes pertinent information/

Content evaluation: Biomineralization
The content is up-to-date and very thorough! I don't think any content is missing. While the content is relevant to the topic, it may be useful to consider restructuring and moving some aspects to the "History" section of the article. Specifically, the discovery of D. acidovorans' biomineralization ability could also be useful in the "History" section.

Tone and balance evaluation
The content is neutral and there doesn't appear to be any bias.

Sources and references evaluation
There are plenty of reliable sources in the Biomineralization topic. The links work, and the references are thorough.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
The content is well-organized. It may be beneficial to scan for grammatical errors. One that stood out to me is at the end of the second paragraph, where it says, "It exist," rather than, "It exists."

New Article Evaluation
The article is supported by an exhaustive list of sources, and seems to reflect the current literature. The article is appropriately organized with the necessary information, and links to other articles.