User:Shooter$20/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Precision agriculture - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article as its proteins to my field of study and is very interesting to me.

Evaluate the article
The lead sentence is concise and is to the point of the topic. It describes what the article is about. It does not describe the major sections or what the article is going to talk about. It is over detailed as it seems that they wrote it to inform people about the history.

The content is relevant to the topic and has been updated recently. All the content of the article belongs there and there is not much missing in the article either. The article is more about history, and it is easy to tell where they updated when new technologies came about.

The article is neutral as it is more informative, and all the claims are proven facts. The article does not persuade people one way or the other.

The facts are proven facts backed up by respected people in the industry. The sources are good information sources, and most are current articles. The sources are about the best you can have as they talk about precision ag more thoroughly. Most of the links do work.

The article is clear and easy to read. There are not any errors in spelling or grammar. The article is well organized as the sections go by the order of when they happened and where developed.

The images in the article make them relatable to the topic and go with the topic ideas.

The article is more of an informative talk and makes it more of a point that it is telling you what the topic is about.

The article’s strength is that it covers a lot of the topic and is very complete.