User:Shoton35mm/Media richness theory/Michgonza123 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Hello there,

This week we were asked to add our photos to our articles and I see that you have done so already. At first glance I did not see your photo but then I kept scrolling and then I found it at the bottom of your article. Although your photo was very nice I would have loved to see it in the beginning of your article, this is what sets the tone for your article. I am not much of a reader personally out of school so when it comes to things like this I am able to think of the people like me and what they would want when reading my article and it would be the photo in the beginning. It makes your article look more interesting and clear of what it is going to be about before reading it. Now when looking into your photo further it is clear it goes with your article and it is teaching while making it look more professional. Their photo has color and a grid to lead people to stop and keep reading. I would have loved  a better captioned under the photo explain what it was that was the explanation. To me that could explain anything I just read throughout your whole article. Be alert to those things, don't leave su questioning.

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)