User:ShouldBeCats/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Visual communication

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I think it applies to our class topic of Digital Writing. I also noticed that there are some citations missing from the article so I think there will be some room to improve and make additions to it.

Evaluate the article
The lead section of this article is well-written. It includes the basic information of the topic in the first sentence along with examples. It also explains what it is used for and the primary components of the topic. Overall, it s concise and understandable to read.

The content of the article is relatively strong. Most of the sections are pretty equal in size and the concepts are broken down in detail with explanations of how they apply to the overall topic for each. However, there should be more explanation of the actual components of visual writing. There is not much content on them compared to other portions of the article and many of the examples are out of date.

Many of the sources are not reliable or credible and should be updated.However, the tone of the article does remain neutral and informative without bias.

The article could use some more visual media, especially considering the topic, as there is only one image on the whole page. Pictures of examples would be beneficial and help explain different concepts.

The talk page is mostly filled with people suggesting more reliable sources. Many agree that some of the ideas are out of date and need more current examples.

Overall, the page is well-written and understandable. The ideas are concise and it is easy to read through.