User:Shruti0405/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Legal history - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because diving into legal matters means to look in the past and dive into the history of legal processes that often can be utilized for future decisions. This article matters because it can give one a great overview on the impact of legal history on different regions and the past. My first impression was that I was very impressed with the overview of each region of the world as well as a detailed background European laws.

Evaluate the article
The lead of this article is well designed and includes a basic definition, with a detailed description of what's to come. The lead is concise, though quite detailed at times, and the lead does include a description of the article's main points. The article's content is relevant to the sources and is up to date, though the sources may a bit outdated. The article is not opinionated and very factual of what has occurred in history, and there are numerous sources that back up the information described, and the links all seem to be functional. The article is straight to the point, though it is very general at times and could be a narrowed a little. It is well organized, and the images are all captioned and useful. The talk page was very insightful, and the article is well-developed