User:Shyanne97/sandbox

= Article Evaluation =

Fake News
At first I thought this article might be a little biased considering some of the word usage. "Damage", "misleading", "deceptive" are usually words used to sway a reader's opinion on the topic, but in this case, even the topic itself has the word "fake" amongst it, and must be described as such. After reading a second time, it is clear to me that there is no biased here. I think the examples on politics and media were relevant to our times, and trust that these are still relevant considering the article was last edited today. The article has MANY references, 264 to be exact, and the ones I have clicked on all seem to work. Most of these references are titled something relating to the negative affects that fake news has had on our society. All in all I believe this article is well written with it's usage of historical examples, country statistics, and credibility of used sources.