User:Sicong05/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Vienna Secession

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
In class we discussed the Vienna Secession, an art movement of Austrian artists and painters. Vienna Secession has chosen to create a new artistic aesthetic, with a bold and distinctive design.

Evaluate the article
This article has a good introduction, giving basic information such as the definition and creation time of Vienna Secession in the first sentence. The composition of Vienna Secession and the location of the Secession Art Gallery are briefly introduced. The introduction is rich in content, which allows readers to better enter into the next reading.

The content is related to the theme, the last editing time was one month ago, and the latest literature provided is the literature in 2018. Considering the age of Vienna Secession, the content is new. Wiener Secessionsgebäude is the most famous Secession building in Austria, but there is no detailed introduction in the article.

The article as a whole is neutral, without serious bias and subjective opinions. The content of the article is objective and there is no attempt to convince the reader.

The source of the content of the article is comprehensive and written by different readers. The most advanced literature was in 2018, which is not very far away from the present. Two of the links are invalid, namely "Senses: Vienna Secession" and "The Vienna Secession in a video-portrait by CastYourArt, Vienna 2011", and there is no article after opening.

The description of the article in the first part, "History", is confusing at times. In "Founding", referring to 1902, and in "Split within the Secession" going back to 1899, it would be better if the events and causes could be explained in the order of the development of the timeline, which would give the reader a better understanding and clear reading experience.

The article contains pictures to enhance the understanding of the subject, especially for the different art forms of Vienna Secession with many pictures to comprehend. The images comply with copyright regulations and are marked with clear picture information to attract people to watch.

There is no evaluation of the article in the discussion, and some disputes over the historical correctness of the article. The difference from the class discussion is that the answer here is more of a correct one, because the most correct answer needs to be presented to the reader.

The overall state of the article is good, and there are many pictures and annotations in it that allow readers to clearly understand what the artistic style of Vienna Secession looks like. The disadvantage is that the links to the two references are invalid, and there is still controversy over the historical development of Vienna Secession. This article is developed, as long as it is checked and revised on some historical years.