User:Sidhu-jas98/Dalit Buddhist movement/Shawnhua8888 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Sidhu-jas98
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Sidhu-jas98/Dalit Buddhist movement

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? I don't think there should be an update in the Lead to reflect the added parts about recent update of Dalit Buddhist Movement.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Yes

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, it is very important to update about the current situation of the movement.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No. All the writings are relevant to the content.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Mostly neutral, but I would say the first sentence of the third paragraph may sounds a bit biased.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, but seems like the article is a bit critical of BJP-RSS's strategy to co-op the Dalit Buddhist supporters.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, the article is pretty neutral in general.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, the writing is backed up by multiple sources.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? I did not take a very close look at the sources themselves, but they should be thorough as they are published on authoritative journals.
 * Are the sources current? Yes, most of the sources are within the past 2-3 years.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? The article is very concise and easy to read.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No grammatical errors.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, the content is very well organized, and easy to follow.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media. No added images.


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

==== Hi Jaspreet, you did a great job at updating the current situation about the Dalit Buddhist Movement. Your article fits very well to the rest of the Dalit Buddhist Movement article, and your writing is very clear and to-the-point. You have also used multiple scholarly sources to back up your writing. The writing provides a good overview about what has happened to the movement in the past few years. The only thing I may note is that one or two sentences seem to be critical towards the BJP's intent to gain support from the Dalit Buddhist. But overall the article is very objective and well-written. ====