User:SiegalSchwall70/Alcmaeonidae/Sailing to Byzantium 2021 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

SiegalSchwall70


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:SiegalSchwall70/Alcmaeonidae


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Alcmaeonidae

Lead
The lead is very effective in introducing the subject and the relevance of the Alcmaeonidae family. I, personally, appreciated how much more concise that this edit of the article's lead was, as it irked me from the moment I saw the un-edited version. The shift of many of these passages into a relevant article body seems like a great decision, and seems more accessible to readings aiming to gain a shorter, introductory, grasp to the subject.

Clarity of Article Structure
The article's clarity is great, and I love the chronological structure of the article body - very intuitive for the reader and pleasing to follow. My only suggestion would be to spice up the title of this section's heading, perhaps using something along the lines of "Family Chronology & Exile"?

Coverage Balance
The added section's length seems fair to the subject's importance within the article, and doesn't strike me as running on any unnecessary tangents. It is also effective in illustrating conflicting narratives within Herodotus' The Histories and other, more widely accepted, narrations of events.

Content Neutrality
The language used within the article is very neutral, and does not seem to be persuading the reader toward any sort of conclusions.

Overall Impressions
I think that the edit of the article looks amazing, and way more sleek than the previous edition. I especially appreciated the editor's inclusion of relevant images, as it really pulls together the article and adds a face to the body of text. Well done!