User:Sienna Pearson/Climate change and crime/Theaphillips Peer Review

General info
(Sienna Pearson)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Sienna Pearson/Climate change and crime
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Lead
The lead section includes a good introductory sentence that properly describes the topic. The information in the lead section provides a brief description of the article's sections and shares details like the definitions of climate change and crime while remaining concise.

Content
The content in the article is relevant and up to date. The information about climate change is up to date and the studies referenced are recent. There is not content in the article that does not belong and there does not seem to be missing content. The article does not directly deal with addressing one of Wikipedia's equity gaps.

Tone and Balance
The content in the article is properly neutral and does not seem to be biased towards any particular position. The article does a great job in explaining the topic in a neutral tone and balanced academic format. The article includes various viewpoints in certain sections, such as stating that colder seasons lead to lower crime rates, but that high temperatures in winter can disrupt that trend in the 'Seasonal crime patterns' section. This paragraph is a good example to show that the article does not have viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented, and does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of a certain position.

Sources and References
The information in the content of the article is all cited properly and reference many reliable secondary sources. The content seems to accurately reflect the information in the cited sources. The referenced sources are thorough and current, with of the sources being written in the last few years. The sources are also written by a diverse spectrum of authors. The links work and seem to be a collection of the best sources available on this topic.

Organization
The article is very well-written and clear and easy to read. There are no grammar or spelling errors. The sections of the article are perfect in explaining their respective paragraphs and demonstrating that the article will touch on all of the relevant points contained in the topic.

Images and Media
The article does not include any images to enhance the topic, but it is strong without the addition of an image.

For New Articles Only
The article is notable because it is supported by multiple secondary sources. The collection of sources is sufficient and accurate to the topic, and the article does a great job referencing other Wikipedia articles by linking them throughout the page. The section headings and subheadings throughout the article are great and relevant to all of the information included.

Overall impressions
This article is very strong and is a great explanation of the topic of the relationship between climate change and crime. All of the sections and content within the sections are relevant and include proper citations and links to other articles. The theories and studies explored throughout the article are perfectly relevant and answer any questions that the reader may have upon entering the article. The tone and format are neutral and professional and the article is concise while thoroughly explaining every part of the topic. Great job!