User:Sierrabasden/Civil engineering/Kvauls Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sierrabasden


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Sierrabasden/Civil engineering


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Civil engineering

Evaluate the drafted changes
The changes made to the article are relevant to the topic and up to date. Given that these changes are mad to the "History" (Civil engineering) section, the article addresses one of Wikipedia' equity gaps by addressing historically underrepresented populations in the history of civil engineering as a discipline. The added content maintains a neutral tone and there are no claims that appear to be heavily biased or view points that are over or underrepresented. therefore the article does not attempt to persuade the reader to a certain conclusion, rather offers exact historical information as presented in the sources. The new content is backed up by a reliable secondary source of information. The content accurately reflects the cited sources. The content is well-written, very concise and clear and it is well organized. However, i would recommend adding citations to one of the statement i.e., "One of the earliest examples of a scientific approach to physical and mathematical problems applicable to civil engineering is the work of Archimedes in the 3rd century BC."

Overall, I believe the content added improved the article, it was very informative and seems more complete. The strengths of the content added was bringing more information to the history of civil engineering as a discipline.