User:Sierrabasden/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Civil engineering - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I have chosen this article to evaluate because I am a civil engineering major. I am interested in all things related to designing and building structures, more specifically bridges. This article matters to me because it provides the basic information I need to know about civil engineering. My impression of this article is that it is really straight to the point.

Evaluate the article
The article on civil engineering has provided information that I believe is relevant to the topic presented. The lead section of the article is good. It has an introductory sentence that is concise and clearly describes the topic, it includes a brief description of the article's major sections and it does not include information that is not present in the article. The content of this article covered important elements of civil engineering like the history, discipline, education and profession. However, it does not mention equity gaps when it comes to gender and pay. It is missing the a little bit of the necessary organization to read and understand easily. Due to the information being so much, even with the bold and italic fonts, information can still be misunderstood with proper organization. The tone in the article was neutral through and through, there were not any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position. Some of the information from the sources presented in this article cannot be evaluated as factual because the links do not work or do not exist anymore. The article has an assessment of a C. It is a well developed article but it still has room for improvement. ~