User:Sierrak1122/sandbox

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creole_language

1) This is a B class article on Wikipedia. It is about Creole/pidgin creoles. The talk page mentions this article Level 4 and High Importance. It is also listed udert the Wikiproject for the awareness and importance of Linguistics.

2) Many of the comments on the talk page are arguments whether the page should include specific information or not. Some contributors argue that it would be specific and lose the general public's interest. While, others argue more accessible information is beneficial for the readers on Wikipedia.

3) Many comments revolve around the authenticity of the bibliography. One contributor was concerned about the two or three of the links. So s/he was going to look at some linguistics book and get back to the Wikipedia page. Another person mentioned the difference between creole and patois. This is again when the question of specific information is raised. This talk page has become very reputable and the seriousness of the sources are the highlights of the talk page.

4) After reading some issues, there is a problem of "ownership" of the talk page. There is a heated discussion about how one contributor felt like s/he owned the page and added and deleted information as they pleased. Whereas, another contributor mentioned that it is a group effort and that the attitude problems needed to be fixed. I feel as if the class level and importance level this is, the people should see the page as a collaborative project.

5)The credibility of contributors and their sources is the most difficult to verify. Because, the page is controlled by "experts" but how much do they know and where and how old are the sorces.