User:Sierraserpas/2022 New Orleans Saints season/Sierraserpas Peer Review

The lead provides a brief overview of what is expected in the upcoming 2022 saints football season.

The second leading paragraph is dedicated entirely to information about coach Sean Payton, who has recently retired. While I do believe this is good and relevant information to have in the article as a whole, there should be more focus on the current football team as a whole when introducing the article.

The first lead paragraph does a better job of concisely describing the article topic, this should be the focus throughout.

I would suggest that the information about Sean Payton and the new heading coach be presented under a separate section from the header. For instance, it could be included with the staff or roster. It could even warrant its own section if you want to include more detail about the coached and their histories.

I do feel that all of the content in the article is relevant and seems to be very up-to-date. It is extremely concise and provides minimum information in the form of charts. I think it could be helpful to add more description to the players that do not have their own wikipages linked to their names. Overall I do think that article covers what it needs to as far as what to expect for the upcoming season.

I believe hat this article is neutral in tone. It provides very straightforward facts about coaches and players. There are no opinions present or mentions of how well the team is expected to play. I think this article has done a very good job of remaining neutral throughout.

I did not notice any new sources added.

The sources already present in the article are up-to-date and reliable.

The links that I checked both in the article and in reference page worked correctly.

I cannot comment on the newly added content because it has not yet been added to the live page and made visible to me.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)