User:Silasakaj/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Kloss's gibbon

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because I was interested in Kloss's Gibbon. After doing a little poking around on Wikipedia, I came across its page and thought I could make some impactful edits. It is important because as biologists, we value all organisms for their inherent value. As conservationists, one of the main goals of the discipline is to document the full range of biodiversity on planet Earth, and expanding resources for documenting biodiversity is valuable.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

This article does not have a well written lead section. It seems to be lacking a lead section entirely. The article is entirely lacking in headings as well. Not all facts are backed up with citations. The articles strengths are that it has some basic information about the gibbon, but it is lacking in depth and details. This article is a part of 2 wiki projects, WikiProject Primates and WikiProject Indonesia. Overall, the article is underdeveloped. There are no conversations occurring on the talk page.