User:Sillygoof23/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
The article I am evaluating is Dr. David M. Berube's Wikipedia page (David M. Berube).

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
The reason I have chosen this article to evaluate is because Dr. Berube is my professor for this assignment and we have looked at his Wiki page together as a class. I feel that this will help me evaluate better than what we could discuss in class and have a good idea of how this assignment is to be completed.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article has a fair lead that describes Dr. Berube's current occupation and his educational background/qualifications. The headings are only Education and Career, with no information in the Education section, but a lengthly Career section. The conciseness of the lead does not really allow for the reader of this article to understand what Dr. Berube has been involved in and accomplished; however, it does give detail through the length of his studies.

The content of the article is very detailed in terms of Dr. Berube's career. It is very dense and information filled with nothing left out. The article is also neutral. It has no mentioning of favorites in terms of life accomplishments or career milestones and is objective in presenting what Dr. Berube has been involved in and contributed to. The sources are from the organizations that Dr. Berube has been associated with as well as journal publishings or other government or educational domains.

The article is simple enough to read even though the section is lengthy. There is clear paragraph separation and smooth transitions between topics. There are no images and the talk page does not have any discussion.

Overall, though the article is short, it is able to encompass Dr. Berube's career effectively.