User:Silouettee20/Church Rockshelter No. 2 Site/Ktrkeller Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Silouettee20
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Silouettee20/Church Rockshelter No. 2 Site

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? no
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? concise

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? there doesn't seem to be

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no, they seem very balanced
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no, no persuasion

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? there is one source, but it is reputable
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? the once source is relevant
 * Are the sources current? yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? no
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? there are no images yet
 * Are images well-captioned? no images yet
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? no images yet
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? no images yet

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? no- you should add 1+ more sources
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? list is very small, but I'm not sure how many sources there are on the topic.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? yes
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? yes

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? yes, content seems thorough and concise
 * What are the strengths of the content added? the content was very direct and concise. there was very little, if any, places that would warrant confusion or interpretation
 * How can the content added be improved? adding images and more sources would improve the overall article.