User:Siluna/Group 10 element/Ishachahal Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sliverash, Siluna


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Siluna/Group_10_element?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Group 10 element

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Content

 * The content added is relevant to the topic as great amount of information about the history and chemical properties of group 10 elements
 * The content appears to be up to date
 * Some content on the applications and biological roles/toxicity of group 10 elements could be added, but the rest of the content added belongs
 * The contribution does a great job of filling in a knowledge gap, this articles looks much better with more information about the history added.

Tone and Balance

 * Is the content added neutral? The content is very neutral and states facts backed by reliable sources.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? There is no bias or persuasive language
 * The viewpoints appear to be those of reliable scientists and the informtaion stated is supported by evidence from sources
 * The content added does not persuade the audience in one way over another.

Sources and References

 * The information added is backed up bay reliable sources
 * The citation very clearly reflects what is said in the article
 * There are a lot of reliable sources that span the knowledge of group 10 elements from 1941-2017, more current sources could be used to provide the most relevant and up to date information as possible.
 * All the sources are reliable peer-reviewed articles, the source appear to provide well supported information. No blogs or news paper sources were used.
 * The links work

Organization

 * The contribution is clear and concise
 * There are no spelling errors
 * The content is organised well with descriptive headings.

Images and Media

 * The tables added are clear and cited, they have titles and organize the data well
 * Could potentially be captioned but not necessary since table titles are quite informative
 * They are cited so no copyright rules broken
 * The tables aid in organising the information well

Overall impressions

 * It has definitely made the article more complete and the article has much more information
 * Excellent organisation and information on the history of Group 10 elements, very thorough and clear
 * Could include more information about the applications and Biological role and toxicity of group 10 elements, and more current sources can be used to provide the most active and recent information about group 10 elements