User:SilverAce7/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Natural science

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
It was closely related to biology and includes topics that are required to understand science.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

It has a good lead section that has the main point and summaries of the other sections. There is a much heavier focus on the history of the definition that makes up more than half of the article. Some sections don't have citations that need them such as the biology and interdisciplinary studies. The links work but there are only 5 sources in the bibliography, most of the citations are connected to one source. The writing quality is decent but there is a few statements that make it not seem like fact and up to opinion. The sections are uneven and some need more details while others need less. Overall the article is underdeveloped as it lacks citations in places where there should be citations, needs more citation variety, and needs a more even coverage of underdeveloped sections and subsections.