User:Simpson Hannah/Language education in the United States/WillDeal Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Simpson Hannah


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Simpson Hannah/Language education in the United States
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Language education in the United States

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The content they added was relevant and useful, as well as being nuetral. However, they may have benefitted from using different diction when composing their edits. The diction of the edits that they made did not give off the "sound" that wikipedia articles generally present. The sources that they used also seemed adaquet and beneficial.