User:Simskyl1/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Andy Schor - this is the article I am evaluating.

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This was the recommended article by my teacher to practice evaluating. It is clearly an article that could use a lot contributions.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section is very brief and only states his exact career position history. Ideally the lead section should also include brief summaries of the rest of his career and life. The content of the article is very sparse there is no information about his current tenure as mayor of Lansing, Michigan since 2017. The tone seems appropriate, primarily because there is very little content for it to be unbalanced on. There is only one image, that being an official headshot of Schor himself. Additional images of his activities and life could help enhance the article. There are only six references for the entire page, those mainly being biography pages. There should be independent and current sources that can attest to the policy goals that he has pursued as mayor. Overall, the article is very weak and needs improvement. The only current strength is the neutrality of the writing but that in itself my come from a negative because there is so little content. The article could easily be improved with a chronological account of his term as mayor, listing his policy objectives and his actions as mayor since he was elected in 2017. There is a decent framework for a well-developed article to be written.