User:Singhasandu/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Realism (arts)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I am genuinely curious and interested in it. My primary impression is that it is an unbiased article that will continue to talk about the origins and history of Realism Art.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The information that is provided in the majority of this article seems to be relevant to the topic. However, in the beginning of the article it is said that realism can also be interchangeably called naturalism, but then proceeds to say that it is not the same thing. Although, having said it is not the same thing there are parts not too long after that talks about Naturalism and its separation from realism. If they are not the same thing this part of the article may be unnecessary to include. Instead, an individual article that focuses more on Naturalism can be linked to the word and further research by the reader can be done if they're interested. There does seem to be a focus on the European start of Realism, although I do not have the knowledge of the history of art around the world I feel it is very possible that Realism did not only start in European countries and other countries explored realism as art is often inspired by what is seen. The article seems to be neutral, there is no talk on Realism begin either ugly or beautiful, just simply stating what the art style main goal is and also the way Realism is related to Naturalism. There seems to be conversation on specific wording and also whether to include the topic of the Realism Art Movement or if it should have its own separate article.