User:Sionkimzion/sandbox

Betty Birner
 * 1) Every information in the article is relevant to Betty Birner as a linguist.
 * 2) The article is neutral, simply stating facts about Betty Birner.
 * 3) I think the biography of Betty Birner and her research part areunderrepresented. There are some facts about her later acheivements but not as much about her early life. Her research is noticed only by "Inversion" which was written shortly.
 * 4) The links work and properly lead me to Wikipedia pages of the underlined words.
 * 5) All other facts are pretty well referenced. However, in her research part, there is no reference at all. I have no idea where the knowledge came from.
 * 6) No information is out of date because there are not many information presented.
 * 7) The article has no rating and is a part of Wikiproject Chicago.
 * 8) The article deals less broadly about the person, unlike what I've learned. The article only focused on Betty Birner as a linguist. I thought the information should cover entire information about the person.