User:Siperez/Ecosystem management/Liv Davis Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Since Sierra was a member of my group and I had the job of fact checker I went through one final time to double check everything was cited correctly. I also ensured that all links and citations were accurate and live. After doing this I went through and did some basic grammar edits. I think Sierra has a fantastic article and did a very good job at laying out what ecosystem management is in an easily read and unbiased manner. Her article is one I would nominate to be considered for a good article. I also think Sierra did a good job of using in-text links to external sites that provide good supplemental information for her topic.


 * 1)  ecosystem functioning → of an ecosystems function I made this in order to make it grammatically consistent with the rest of the sentence
 * 2) management which indirectly benefits society → management. This indirectly benefits society- I made this edit to prevent the caption from being a run on sentence.
 * 3) coauthors→ co-authors
 * 4) Stakeholders→ Stakeholders- this is an important concept and in order to show that to a reader i think it is important is it put in bold.
 * 5) Mutual → reciprocal- You use mutual later in the same sentence so I think it would be best to diversity the word choice!

Added Section Spaces for Malpai Borderland management: and Helge å River & Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve: - I did this because it breaks it up into slightly smaller text and easier for a reader to look at.