User:Siribeck/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Astrology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I am a skeptic, but I thought it would be cool to learn more. First impression is that the article is extensive and has a lot of sources.

Evaluate the article
The article addresses everything that makes a good lead. The content is relevant and extensive, but it does not address topics related to historically underrepresented populations, but it does address historical origination of astrology. The article maintains a neutral tone and focuses on informing rather than persuading. The sources are reliable and current, they are very frequent throughout the article, and come from different sources. The article is well written and organized. The article has 17 images including diagrams that reflect what the article is talking about. They are visually appealing and correspond to each paragraph clearly. The talk page is longer than the article and gives insight into the purpose and intention for altering certain things throughout the article. It seems like very respectful communication. Overall I think this article and overwhelming at first because of how in depth it goes, but this page does a good job at breaking up the information in a digestible way.