User:SiyuanWang531/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Little Women (2019 film)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I really like the original Little Women novels. I went to see the film version of the novel as soon as I found out. I think this movie almost perfectly presents the image of the characters in the novel in my mind. So I chose the article from the 2019 edition of the Little Women movie. My preliminary impression of this article is that the content of this article is very clear and illustrated with pictures, which brings me a very good reading experience.

Evaluate the article
Lead section

The lead section of the article contains a sentence that clearly states the main idea of the article. It includes a description of the main content, which introduces the reader to the relevant information of the film. There's no information in the lead that's not already in the text. I think the lead is concise. The article describes the content of the movie and other relevant information in simple and clear text.

Content

The content of this article is relevant to the subject. The last edit date for this article is September 8, 2022. So its content is up to date. There is nothing missing or irrelevant in the text. This article does not address Wikipedia's fairness gap. Nor does it address historically underrepresented populations and subjects.

Tone and Balance

This is an article about movies, so I hardly have my own subjective preferences and opinions. The description in the article is neutral; it does not favor any particular position. There are no viewpoints are overrepresented or underrepresented in this article. The article does not trying to persuade the reader to support one position or abandon another.

Sources and References

The facts in this article are supported by reliable secondary sources of information. Their sources are comprehensive. These sources are not current, the most recent of which is from 2020. These sources are written by different authors who do not include historically marginalized people. I think there will be better sources because it's already 2022 and there will probably be updates.

Organization and writing quality

I think this article is well written. This article provides and describes the relevant information about the film in a simple and clear way. Readers can easily find the information they need in the process of reading. Because the article is well organized, readers won't get lost in too much information. There are no grammatical or spelling mistakes in this article.

Images and Media

This article contains pictures to deepen the understanding of the subject. The poster of the film appeared in the introduction of the article. Readers can know it's about movies the moment they click on the page. But the layout of these pictures is not very attractive. There are only a few pictures in the whole article, which is not good visually.

Talk page discussion

This article is featured by WikiProject Vital Articles, and they rated it Level C. The article is a part of WikiProjects. I think the way Wikipedia discusses topics is more about having reliable sources of information. And most of what we talk about in class is our own opinion.

Overall impressions

I think this is a great complete article. It uses very clear language and reliable sources to introduce readers to the content of the film, the actors, and a lot of other relevant information. Readers can find the answers they want in the article. I think it would be nice to include more pictures of the movie content in this article. This can attract readers to watch the film and have an understanding of the film world described by the text.