User:Sjapatel/New sandbox

Implications Section:

"Glass cliff positions risk hurting the women executives' reputations and career prospects because, when a company does poorly, people tend to blame its leadership without taking into account situational or contextual variables. Researchers have found that female leaders find it harder than male ones to get second chances once they have failed due to having fewer mentors and sponsors and less access to a protective "old boys' network".

However, some researchers argue that companies in bad situations offer more opportunity for power and influence compared with companies that are stable."

Possible Additions Here:

- Effects on other women in the workplace (how the use of women leaders as scapegoats may effect their treatment, how it effects their ambition in the workplace)

- Second sentence doesn't feel very strong, and I'm not sure that it differs enough from what was previously said. Could add more general implications and the effects that it has had on specific women leaders? Although that may better fit in the examples section

- Could add onto the end of the first paragraph relating to the effects of not having access to network of sponsors and mentors

- Reinforces negative stereotypes about qualities (masculine) related to leadership, qualification of women

- (In a separate section, could talk about how companies have combatted the glass cliff since evidence about it has been presented, if any)